SurfaceAgentX2Zero
2:44 Wed Sep 14
Re: Fury v Joshua
|
Eerie Descent 7:39 Tue Sep 13
I agree. Jimmy Carr is a massive cunt. I hate the semi-camp, tax-dodging, champagne-socialist twat.
But he's right about how society thinks it's OK to be racist about gypsies.
And the Welsh. The cunts.
|
Eerie Descent
12:46 Wed Sep 14
Re: Fury v Joshua
|
That's seriously slim pickings, Griff.
|
stewie griffin
11:52 Tue Sep 13
Re: Fury v Joshua
|
Povetkin wobbled him early from memory. He looked good against Pulev. Think you're a little harsh on Klitschko there, who was in the best shape he had been in for years and moved like he had never moved in his whole career. Was a far better performance than the one he put in against fury, for sure.
Still...none of that likely matters as fury will be overwhelming favourite and justifiably so. He went to new levels against whyte, for me. Never rated wilder but whyte was dangerous and he was pretty much punch perfect, albeit that whytes corner has to take some of the blame for sending him out as a southpaw and trying to fuck around with what made him dangerous in the first place
|
Steady
11:49 Tue Sep 13
Re: Fury v Joshua
|
Fury will absolutely destroy him, in fact Fury at 50% his usual self would beat Joshua with ease
|
Hermit Road
11:46 Tue Sep 13
Re: Fury v Joshua
|
What did Jimmy Carr say?
|
Eerie Descent
11:20 Tue Sep 13
Re: Fury v Joshua
|
I think you probably need to look at the calibre of those bigger guys.
Klitschko is his standout win, and let's be fair, the 40 year old could and should have had him out of there. What other top big heavy has he looked so good against?
His most complete performance was arguably Povetkin, a smaller heavyweight.
|
MaryMillingtonsGhost
11:10 Tue Sep 13
Re: Fury v Joshua
|
stewie griffin 3:15
His performances against bigger heavies has generally been pretty good – most of his struggles have come against smaller, shorter fighters; so may have more than a punchers chance.
Good point. Seemed to have a great uppercut prior to him getting beat, haven't really noticed it as much in his recent fights. Probably easier to land on a taller opponent, less restriction/more leverage? Council Scum?
|
WHUDeano
9:40 Tue Sep 13
Re: Fury v Joshua
|
As mad and improbable as it might logically sound. I think Joshua wins the first of this trilogy.
|
BRANDED
8:13 Tue Sep 13
Re: Fury v Joshua
|
The money tho
|
Eerie Descent
7:39 Tue Sep 13
Re: Fury v Joshua
|
Jimmy Carr. The man who had a hair transplant, and who says the word CUNT in a really posh voice for comedic effect.
Let's all listen to that guy.
|
marlonsrightsock
7:21 Tue Sep 13
Re: Fury v Joshua
|
Joshua's comments on race seem to have coincided with his religious conversion
|
SurfaceAgentX2Zero
7:11 Tue Sep 13
Re: Fury v Joshua
|
Some of the posts on here demonstrate very well exactly what it was that Jimmy Carr was taking the piss out of.
|
Eerie Descent
7:04 Tue Sep 13
Re: Fury v Joshua
|
Joshua absolutely had to take this fight. Fury proper called him out, if he didn't take it his credibility would've been done.
And yes, he massively cares about that, that was very clear after the meltdown.
|
Charoo
6:47 Tue Sep 13
Re: Fury v Joshua
|
Be good entertainment in the run up to Christmas, lots of nonsense, back and forth and little documentaries inside training etc which I generally enjoy more than the fight.
Then an excuse on fight night to get together and let’s face it, it will be interesting to see. Shame it’s not at the time when everyone was desperate for it but definitely still worth watching.
|
zico
6:41 Tue Sep 13
Re: Fury v Joshua
|
As others have said you can't say Joshua swerves anyone so credit where it's due. Just can't see how he wins though. Fury the better boxer and took everything Wilder threw at him and got up from one he shouldn't have got up from. Joshua will take it seriously, depends if Fury does.
|
stepney hammer
6:30 Tue Sep 13
Re: Fury v Joshua
|
"If / when he loses this, he’s done."
In terms of the world title picture. I still think there would be interest in a rematch with Whyte and a fight with Wilder should he decide to continue on.
|
goose
6:09 Tue Sep 13
Re: Fury v Joshua
|
fair play to AJ for taking this fight off the back of two straight defeats.
yes he will get paid a lot of money, but he is still showing a desire to fight the best out there.
you never know with Fury - he might not take this as seriously as he should.
at least we have seen the top 4 heavyweights all willing to fight one another.
|
New Jersey
5:53 Tue Sep 13
Re: Fury v Joshua
|
Just can't see Joshua getting anywhere near Fury, who's been the outstanding heavyweight of the last decade.
Fury must think a victory is relatively straight forward, massive pay day, then finish with Usyk.
|
Takashi Miike
5:25 Tue Sep 13
Re: Fury v Joshua
|
hopefully fury knocks him out
|
Hermit Road
5:19 Tue Sep 13
Re: Fury v Joshua
|
“ Been fashionable for a while now to dislike Joshua”
Didn’t it become more prevalent after his repeated racist tirades?
If a white boxer referred to ‘the superior white race’, I’d think that black people who still liked him were a bit weird and possibly self hating. I’d also think that whites who still liked him were a bit weird too, just not self-hating.
|
13 Brentford Rd
4:37 Tue Sep 13
Re: Fury v Joshua
|
The result depends on which Fury turns up.
Joshua is too rigid and doesn't punch as hard as wilder.
|
| 
